Does not Wisdom counsel that the way of the Capitalists is the way of "he that would take it all" and the ways of the Socialists the way of "he that has no zeal"? Does not Wisdom know that Creator has a better way? Creator would have you be His Ambassadors, for His ways are above the ways of the "man of the earth" who oppresses the helpless and violates the land. He would have you be His Consuls for His methods of Business instill initiative and brotherhood. He would have you be His Warriors for Love will conquer Hate and Truth will rise again from the mire of the street.

The practical aspect of the "To the R.E.Z." program is to promote "Ownership via Servant hood". This phrase seems to be a contradiction in terms while in reality the world’s choices are prejudicial and class conscious. In capitalism ownership is either by the individual or a corporation and everyone else is either an employee or competitor. While in socialism ownership is held by the state or a communal enterprise and success is managed by consensus. One champions the opportunities for success in the dog eat dog world of business; while the other touts security and welfare (entitlement programs) at the expense of individual initiative. Because both have worthwhile qualities yet glaring defects the proponents of either cause must create an adversarial environment and the would be participant chooses the lesser of two evils; a choice made with relative experience (the environment they grew up in) rather than purity of principle.

One will find that the Creator’s plan provides for both Success & Security in ways unique to the schemes of capitalists or socialists. One or more of Yahweh’s principles are violated or ignored in their plans making them poisonous to all who eat at their tables. They are:

Do unto others as you would have done unto you.

Creator Yahweh’s solution to the dilemma of "which way economic security" is to reward individuals who follow His principles with their own personal vocation. There is only one Vocation! Any definition of vocation must include one word, or it is not a vocation. That word is ownership. There is only one vocation. Everything else is just a job, a trade, or a profession. The one vocation is being a business person. It does not matter which job, or trade, or profession the business person chooses thru which to manifest his vocation, he and

he alone has the maximum success and security that job, trade, or profession has to offer! Lofty goal you say, but it’s not for everyone. Not everyone has what it takes to own their own business. And again we parrot one lie after another from the pit of tradition. We just don’t understand the Creator’s ways; nor do we understand what ownership is or what it takes to achieve it. We’ve been programmed by the propaganda wars between Capitalists and Communists who wouldn’t know the truth if they saw it lying in the street.

Ownership in the view of a Capitalist is basically having no one tell you what to do. It is absolute power, complete autonomy. What a recipe for brutality and or abuse, and the socialists register their point. But in Yah’s economy, the primary requisite for ownership is being a servant. Notice, I did not say, prerequisite. One does not begin with servant hood only to graduate into ownership. One remains a servant in order to be qualified in ownership. One cannot break the Servant Rule or he ceases to be great. As a servant one always knows what one would have done unto you, and thus can represent the expectations of a servant to an owner. But how can a servant own; who runs that business? It’s so easy really; the business the servant owns is managed by the partisan that servant mentored, just as he manages it for the one who owns the interest he is in charge of. The partisan becomes the owner’s manager as the owner serves or manages the interests of the one who mentored him. The ultimate question must arise, who owns the initial enterprise? The Creator has made provision for this also. It is "owned" by an investor pool of elders and partisans. The eldership is comprised of Chief/Singers of the Circle. More will be presented at the institute as to their identities and election, but for now let it suffice to say that socialists have recognized an important aspect of this truth, but have violated the principle by not allowing "ownership" to percolate down to all of the followers of their propaganda. Again, a manipulation of truth results in an elite class lording it over those they claim to represent. This is also the main fallacy of any "royal born" form of government. In the Creator’s Circle, even the Chief/Singers must serve.